Comparison of the visual results after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia.
نویسندگان
چکیده
To the Editor: During the past 3 years, several studies have suggested that small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) is a promising alternative to LASIK for the correction of myopia. For this reason, we have read with great interest the article by Lin et al.1 about the comparison of the visual results after SMILE and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK (FS-LASIK) for the treatment of myopia. However, we have concerns about two facts of this study. First, when reading the preoperative demographics, we have observed that the preoperative cylinder was higher in the FS-LASIK group than in the SMILE group, with a surprising P value of 1.101 for the comparison of this parameter between both groups. We remark that the maximum possible P value is 1.0, which is an exceptional statistical situation that is only found when the parameter compared in two groups is exactly equal in both. Given the fact that the amount of preoperative astigmatism may be relevant in the refractive outcomes of the procedure, we invite the authors to revise this P value. Second, the authors conclude that both SMILE and FS-LASIK provide excellent outcomes in terms of safety, efficacy, and predictability. Given the fact that the authors included a small population (60 eyes in the SMILE group and only 51 eyes in the FS-LASIK group) and a short-term follow-up (only 3 months), we think that the evidence provided in this study is not enough to support that the visual results of SMILE are comparable to the well-known visual outcomes of FS-LASIK.2,3 Although SMILE seems to induce less dry eye4 and has less impact on corneal sensation4,5 than FS-LASIK, we think that further prospective studies with a larger number of cases and a longer follow-up are needed to ensure the real advantages and disadvantages of SMILE. Until these studies are available, we do believe that FS-LASIK should still be considered as the goal standard for the correction of myopia. REFERENCES 1. Lin F, Xu Y, Yang Y. Comparison of the visual results after SMILE and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia. J Refract Surg. 2014;30:248-254.
منابع مشابه
Corneal biomechanical effects: small-incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis.
PURPOSE To compare the biomechanical properties of the cornea after small-incision lenticule extraction (lenticule extraction group) with those after femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (femtosecond LASIK group). SETTING Tianjin Eye Hospital & Eye Institute, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China. DESIGN Pro...
متن کاملRefractive lenticule extraction (ReLEx) through a small incision (SMILE) for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: current perspectives
Small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) is an alternative to laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. SMILE can be performed for the treatment of myopia ≤-12 D and astigmatism ≤5 D. The technology is currently only available in the VisuMax femtosecond laser platform. It offers several advantages ...
متن کاملEfficacy, safety, predictability, contrast sensitivity, and aberrations after femtosecond laser lenticule extraction.
PURPOSE To compare femtosecond lenticule extraction and small-incision lenticule extraction to treat moderate to high myopia. SETTING Department of Ophthalmology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. DESIGN Prospective clinical single-masked paired-eye study. METHODS An intrastromal lenticule was cut by a femtosecond laser and manually extracted. In femtosecond lenticule extractio...
متن کاملCorneal Clarity and Visual Outcomes after Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction and Comparison to Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis
Purpose. To evaluate corneal clarity and visual outcomes after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and compare them to femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK). Materials and Methods. Fifty-eight myopic eyes of 33 patients who underwent SMILE were compared to 58 eyes of 33 patients treated with FS-LASIK. All procedures were performed using VisuMax® femtosecond laser ...
متن کاملComparison of the visual results after SMILE and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia.
PURPOSE To perform a comparative clinical analysis of the safety, efficacy, and predictability of two surgical procedures (ie, small incision lenticule extraction [SMILE] and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK [FS-LASIK]) to correct myopia. METHODS Sixty eyes of 31 patients with a mean spherical equivalent of -5.13 ± 1.75 diopters underwent myopia correction with the SMILE procedure. Fifty-one ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of refractive surgery
دوره 30 9 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014